Explore the legal complexities surrounding the cases of Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein, as highlighted by journalist Ronan Farrow. Discover the parallels in legal proceedings and the impact of prior bad act evidence on these high-profile trials.
What did David Pecker admit to?
David Pecker admitted lying to protect himself, his company, and Donald Trump.
Why did Ronan Farrow stop discussing the case publicly?
Ronan Farrow announced to cease discussing the case publicly after concerns from prosecutors.
What legal theories were applied in Trump and Weinstein cases?
Legal theories involved evidence of uncharged crimes to establish intent.
Why was the Weinstein verdict potentially overturned?
The verdict was potentially overturned due to the inclusion of more attenuated evidence.
What impact did prior bad act evidence have on the trials?
It stripped the defendant's presumption of innocence and right to a fair trial.
What did the appellate court find in the case?
The appellate court found a violation of due process rights and denial of a fair trial.
How did prosecutors impact Weinstein's trial?
They included prior bad act witnesses, impacting the case but not directly related to the charges.
What surprised the public in the trial proceedings?
The narrow circumstances for prior bad act evidence in the trial surprised the public.
Why is a strong appellate argument expected?
Issues allowed in the trial provide a basis for a strong appellate argument.
What parallels were sought for Harvey Weinstein's situation?
Comparison to another appellate case was sought for Harvey Weinstein's situation.
Explore the legal complexities surrounding the cases of Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein, as highlighted by journalist Ronan Farrow. Discover the parallels in legal proceedings and the impact of prior bad act evidence on these high-profile trials.
Popular Topics